Editorial illustration for the PixaryAI review
Editorial illustration (image generated by AI — art. 50 of the EU AI Act). See responsible AI principles (in Spanish).

Review of PixaryAI

6.8out of 10
Last tested: 07/09/2026 The Clothoff AI desk Five weighted criteria

No commercial relationship: this entry carries no affiliate link and the provider plays no part in the mark; the weights are the same across the catalogue — how we review.

Summary

Editorial verdict

PixaryAI scores 6.8 out of 10 in the editorial test of 07/09/2026. The mark combines five weighted criteria and rests on the data the provider publishes on its own site. What it leaves unpublished is recorded as an absence and costs it marks, rather than being estimated.

PixaryAI is a third-party service that the Clothoff AI desk reviewed on 07/09/2026. An in-browser AI video generator: text to video and image to video. This site describes the service, does not operate it and processes no reader images.

Strengths

  • A free trial in the browser, with no setting up
  • Text to video and image to video in a single flow
  • Built on open-source models, according to the page
  • An official page available in Spanish

Weaknesses

  • «Uncensored» in the marketing, yet it bars sexual content
  • No price and no plan published
  • No privacy policy and no retention documented
  • The limits of the free tier are unspecified
Checked: 07/09/2026

Verified data

Type of serviceAn in-browser AI video generator: text to video and image to video
Category featureNot applicable: no undress-type processing; sexual content is barred by its own rules
Free tierA free trial described as «generous»; concrete limits undocumented
PricesNo plan and no amount published on the page consulted
Stated restrictionsNo sexual content, no celebrity faces, no violence, no political content
Image inputPNG, JPG, JPEG or WEBP of up to 10 MB; the video inherits the aspect ratio
PrivacyNo privacy policy and no retention periods documented on the page
Platform and languageA browser, with no local GPU; an official page in Spanish

Every figure in this table comes from the provider's own public pages, read on 07/09/2026, in the currency the provider itself uses. Prices in this category change often and without notice.

Five weighted criteria

Score breakdown

Privacy and security (30%)

No privacy policy and no retention periods documented on the page. No tool in the catalogue reaches full marks on this criterion, because none documents the complete life cycle of the uploaded file.

Output quality (25%)

Quality is judged on the samples the provider itself circulates, looking at the finish along the edge of the mask, at anatomical coherence and at consistency across successive generations. No photograph of a real person was uploaded at any point in the process.

Price and free tier (20%)

No plan and no amount published on the page consulted. A free trial described as «generous»; concrete limits undocumented. What we mark is not the amount but whether the cost of a single generation can be worked out from the public page without signing up.

Speed (15%)

The provider publishes no concrete generation times on the page consulted. The check consisted of reading the provider's pricing, terms, help and data-policy pages, and setting what it advertises against what its own terms allow.

Support and transparency (10%)

A browser, with no local GPU; an official page in Spanish. A translated interface changes neither the applicable jurisdiction nor the handling of the data, two things that depend on where processing happens and not on the language it is read in. The full breakdown of the method, with the weight of each criterion, is published separately.

Editorial test note

How we checked

  • 07/09/2026 — reading the sources: the provider's pricing, terms, help and data-policy pages, under the protocol published in how we review.
  • 07/09/2026 — checking the figures: the amounts and limits in the table are copied from those pages in the original currency, with no conversion and no rounding on our part.
  • Nothing uploaded: the check involved no photograph of a real person, neither our own nor anyone else's.
Common questions

Questions about PixaryAI

Is there a free tier?

A free trial described as «generous»; concrete limits undocumented.

How much does PixaryAI cost?

No plan and no amount published on the page consulted.

What does the service do with an uploaded image?

No privacy policy and no retention periods documented on the page.

Which photos may be used?

Only your own photos, or photos of adults who have given explicit consent. The grounds are set out in responsible AI (in Spanish), and the takedown route in NCII report (in Spanish).